Thu 24 Jul 2008
We’re in Iraq for long haul: Labor | theage.com.au
Sometimes, I really fucking hate being proven right. Especially when I make predictions that some politician isn’t going to do what we all think he’ll do, and then of course, he doesn’t do that. Politicians make promises and often they’re bullshit. Complete shit. They tell lies to get elected because the truth is far from inspiring enough to have people put a ‘1’ beside their name.
And when Rudd finally listened to the mass antiwar opinion in Australia, he said he’d pull the troops out. But they were only ‘combat troops’, as if the other guys with guns were the nice ones being left there under the same proviso that Rudd was rhetorically rejecting by pulling the first lot out. And we looked at all of this with suspicion whilst relating to people’s hope in at least Rudd was pulling some out instead of none at all.
But once again, Labor has proved us right. It comes as no surprise that the Labor Foreign minister has come out saying they’re committed to the War in Iraq with their ‘non-combat’ troops. They’ve got some big ship sitting off the course guarding offshore oil exports and the minister said something about the region being ‘instable’ and ‘economically important’ which kind of actually tells the truth of why they’re there.
It’s not about democracy or any of that bullshit. It’s about the coalition’s economic interests in the region. Australia is still part of that because Labor still has to run the same system Howard was.
Technorati Tags: Rudd, Labor, War, Iraq, troops





















